Join the Conversation

  1. Once again we’ve lived through a corrupted “election” thanks to the Uniparty in DC and I would like to know how Mike feels about that. Oh! There it is! The “Putin and his War machine” Propaganda. How disappointing.

    Reply
  2. Imagine worshiping a god who destroyed all life on earth.
    You all talk about satan being evil, but he never destroyed all life on earth.
    You talk about the flood and dont think about the millions of babies that were drowned.
    You know of the priests who've raped countless native and non-native children, yet you still call yourselves christians and still follow the bible, a book filled with genocide, torture, child sacrifice, rape, incest, murder, lies, and thats stuff god allowed, endorsed or even commanded himself.

    BTW: If we all come from Adam and Eve, then we are all inbred from the beginning, and if we all come from noah, then were all inbred again. just sayin.

    Reply
  3. The outcomes of the collectivist environmental policies will NOT reflect their ostensible motivations, but their ACTUAL misanthropic motivations. By their fruits shall ye know them, not by their self-justifying "narratives".

    Reply
  4. To any that care to dig deeper, and who have the eyes to see, this man Jordan Peterson is a blasphemous hypocrite, and is misleading all who appreciate his lies, as he should know better than to play these word games regarding something so very serious as The Truth, if he delves so deeply into It.

    According to Freud's observations, which are almost wholly discounted, if not hated, for these truths that he uncovered, this man Peterson would be the type of psych-doctor that seeks power over others, and I am confident that such is absolutely true and correct.

    Both the meek and the literal bearers of well-sharpened swords (not those bearing the sword of Truth) will not both be able to inherit this Earth, or will they, Mr. Peterson?

    You are a completely dangerous fraud, and you tread on Very Dangerous Ground, I believe you are aware.

    Sincerely, Marcus Knight

    Reply
  5. @jordanpeterson ask Your congressman or whoever you get on your program about the world economic forum nobody seems to be asking questions about that and there seems to be several of our politicians involved in that world economic forum along with Bill Gates all of those people who are trying to destroy us

    Reply
  6. As evidence for Roman ethics shaping Jesus. They cast lots for his clothes. That implies that the righteousness of Jesus isn't in his clothes.

    How did they mock him? Mocking implies a challenge to understand value sometimes.

    "Hail King of the Jews" as a joke as a way to mock Kingship as a place to be contemptuous of common people means Jesus can't settle for being king. He has to be responsible to everyone and himself. If one is large enough to understand then one is small enough to fit.

    Mocking nepotism "What are you doing up there. Come down from the cross, if you are the son of God."

    Meaning that there's a responsibility beyond God that if one finds then one is equal to God. That's a radical Roman ideal that isn't necessarily implicit in Jewish philosophy. It's a beautiful marriage of Roman and Jewish ideals in the essence of Christianity. The only danger of Christianity is that one can be bitter. "What if there was a person who was not only good but as good as it gets" as a bitter justification to abandon one's ideals in favor of bitter inappropriate contempt that would make the Jewish people labor under the delusion of being better than everyone else, instead of a product and investment from the best of everyone else that implies respect and responsibility.

    These are my Roman philosophical insights into Christianity from a Roman perspective.

    I say Roman because a stoic acceptance of a role and a responsibility in spite of apparent house politics and the temporary evil of the weeds is the Roman foundation that one could trace to Marcus Aurelius.

    Reply
  7. How many of the people that come to your events would say they are democrat? None? Really? Why?
    So all those people are backwards uneducated conservatives? Have you told them how they rank on your personality chart? Have they heard your statements made on Bill mahar show a few years ago? It also seems every conservative you have on your show seems to outshine you. They don't have you pegged in a personality chart so they all let you be the best yu can be. And they are very respectful of you rightfully so or not.

    Reply
  8. Being somewhat of a cynic, I have to disagree somewhat with the premise that the Dems’s religion is climate change. No, that is the religion of the Far Left which seems to be controlling the Dems. It all seems to be, ultimately, tied to a globalist agenda which is creating a system of absolute control that the Far Left will be EXTREMELY unhappy with once they wake up to discover they will also be the objects of controll.

    Reply
  9. Incidentally, as a friend, I have a personal favorite wisdom that has helped me over the years.

    Respect is having the appropriate amount of sense so that reasonable people leave one alone.

    Being liked means someone offers you something to eat or drink when one passes by.

    Respect without good will tends to be brutal and small.

    Being liked without respect tends to be entitled and inappropriate socially.

    This has been a common theme of how to prioritize being liked and being respected. Being respected always comes first, but being respected is only sustainable if good will is implicit too.

    Reply
  10. In terms of politics if one understands the flow of Law and Order one can understand the difference in politics between Republicans and Democrats.

    It's a type of criminal intelligence, when levered up by government infrastructure like medicaid and medicare and social security, it does leverage up criminality, but it also elevates normative citizens apart from direct relationships with Law enforcement that often leads to blue waves of civil rights successes in the Legislative and Judicial branches.

    When the crime gains enough oxygen, the years of rest that allows the former police fronts to metastasize and regroup from the last battles with crime. Much of the post modernism has had the beneficial effect of unearthing bad police behavior and reinforcing healthy standards for new breeds of police officers who respect civil rights and have good timing with the community so as to not hurt elevated citizens while making a real dent in crime. That funding tends to ride what may be termed as a "red wave" that allows for new funding for better police officers that have already been in the works for years with better D.A.s too.

    Blue waves leverage up citizens as well as the criminals so as to not punish the righteous with the guilty. And then there's a red wave that lifts up the law enforcements and citizens and some criminals who actually serve as redemption communications from within the weeds. There is a specific breed of criminal that tends to be repentant and tend to enjoy the opportunity to help people worthy of help. It's not something that can be "read" in someone. A criminal is still a criminal in any of the normative sinful situations. But when such criminals spot people "behind enemy lines" who are teachable tend to bring the best of criminal ethics to make it possible to deal with ethical police to create safer neighborhoods, which is the same goals of educated police officers.

    Within the background context most of what's said is that these guys are just talking heads and reality is the context. Emotional security depends on knowing the context in which one lives.

    Some of the problems listed aren't real necessarily. Nature worship is often a partial goal so as to create dialogue of the mother on equal negotiating factors with the father archetypically speaking and that can only be done from a position of strength.

    There are two possible interpretations of the speakers, in terms of profiling FBI style.

    Either Dr. Peterson and the Congressman are only about their side of their story and self involved in their own pain and are therefore fundamentally untrustworthy;

    Or their constituents are fundamentally untrustworthy and they're communicating to someone across the spectrum. *That would imply that they're in a position of social containment that can present unreasonable responses as reasonably as possible so as to continue constructive dialogues from superficially diametrically opposed to one another.

    I don't demonize the other sides. I have a choice in response to that information. I can be afraid and sink into paranoia of their side because of the apparent unreasonable position to genuine concerns and experiences that I have personally, which would be destructively and hypocritically opposed, I can be destructively naive and pretend that none of their interests conflict with mine and only assume the best out of blind faith, I can be neutral and assume none of this shit is my business and not engage with them at all, which seems to have a -1 approach that would add -1s over a series of time, which is a form of damage control that keeps me coherent and open minded until my front would've gotten appropriately large but manageable, that's the reasonable approach because the paranoid approach would have the same -1 over time but with no turn around +1 dialogue over a period of time.

    Right now I'm doing a + neutral approach because it seems to me that I'm well understood by now but feel a sense of responsibility and gratitude to police officers and social workers to make this part clear, as well as a sense of duty to these courageous men who dialogue with me.

    *Courage is nuanced Dr. Peterson. Courage is knowing the limits of one's reality, accepting it, and then speaking out. Courage can be such a habit that it's often overlooked by people that have it because courage becomes a part of someone's character so as to be invisible and taken for granted.

    My main point is that internal house politics isn't something an outsider could ever have an educated opinion on. It's too nuanced and complicated to try to intervene based on "anger" or whatever. One would inevitably step in shit. Let people be gray and nuanced in house politics and let reality confirm itself so that I stay coherent in my personal politics and you stay coherent in your house politics and what's in between is what's negotiated for mutual dignity and gain and respect and good will.

    That's why I don't investigate anyone's personal lives. That would be unethical and if I did that I would inevitably step in shit politically speaking.

    My advice is don't be stupid. Don't involve yourself in anyone's personal house politics. That's the world of gray and potential evil where everyone would look "evil" to an in between soul who failed to negotiate.

    There seems to always be a stink in the outskirts of house politics and a fool could be led by the nose with their foolish anger.

    That's why Dr. Peterson's anger isn't wise enough.

    My main difference with Dr. Peterson is that he argued that individuals are too complicated to know themselves. My response to that is he misplaced the complicated label. House politics are too complicated to fix once properly negotiated. Only good timing can save people after a certain point.

    Academic conversation is intimately related to house politics. That's why college is always necessary. The clean slate philosophers, as I call them, have an immortality to them. Aristotle, Lucretius, Plato, Epicurus, and Democritus. Democritus postulated Atomic theory. Lucretius theorized evolution in the first century. Epicurus in some way was one of the first philosophers to argue for personal responsibility that laid the groundwork to Roman practicality that placed divinity second to the divinity of the Roman aristocracy that filtered down to Marius in hiring Roman Plebian/worker class for Roman soldiers all the way down to, one could argue, Christianity. Dr. Peterson noted that God ceased to believe in himself in the face of evil for the basic goodness of Jesus.

    Christianity and Judaism didn't arise in a vacuum. Much of Roman ideas filtered down all the way down that led to Christianity. Lucretius argued against human sacrifice and that the philosopher's duty is to map out the unknown and used the irreducibility of atoms to advocate for an irreducible simplicity and indestructibility of the soul, which is an interesting marriage between Democritus and Plato who used to be philosophical enemies. Plato at first spent time burning Democritus' texts of Atomic philosophy, but then Lucretius unites them and advocates for individual evolution and a disdain for ignorant priesthood that pathed the philosophical groundwork that allowed for Jesus to be possible.

    Philosophers do all the unglamorous work to pave the way for glamorous individuals like Jesus who tend to reap the glory of hundreds of years of philosophical progress, and it's how it should be. Courage is always more important than intelligence. But it comes at a price. Jesus would've had a hard time reacclimating to normative social conditions that would've allowed him to socialize normally. *An interesting verse in Matthew had Jesus calling his followers foolish, but then they asked him to stay with them because the night was close and invited him in to eat and drink with them. In Revelations Jesus valued that more than miracles. "I was hungry and you did not feed me. I was thirsty and you offered me nothing to drink." That's a moral expectation that most people missed chasing the glory of Jesus.

    These are the clean slate philosophers who's souls survived as foundational "Platonic Ether" that allows for someone like Jesus to rise from the dead and supplement a stagnant Rome that needs things like Medicaid and Medicare and Social Security that can leverage up citizenship to be equal to the need for order.

    Much of Christianity and Judaism owes it's foundations to the Greeks and to the Romans. House politics makes things too complex to be reduced to "who's right or wrong." Once the stage is set people can only play their roles. That's the tragedy of history and the value of Stoicism.

    Reply
  11. Mr. Peterson,
    I appreciate you taking the time to interview Mr. Johnson. However I hear a lot of words and nothing about real solutions.
    Ambiguous terms and optimism, bla bla bla. What about all of the damage done to the working class Americans. The decimation of the middle class and small business owners, driving them into poverty. The core issues are totally ignored with the exception of fossil fuels. I'm speaking of the systemic corruption of all of our American institutions, the perversion of truth, and the loss of morality! Frankly I'm not impressed with this politician or any other for that matter. At the current rate of decline, The USA won't survive until the next Presidential election.
    I admire you and the work you are doing, Mr. Peterson. If nothing else you are raising the awareness of a multitude of people. Thank You!

    Reply
  12. My family has had the privilege of spending a small amount of time with Congressman Johnson. He’s undoubtedly one of the most brilliant people in Washington. More importantly, he’s actually a Christian and father first, politician second. I’m so excited to listen to this podcast.

    Bossier City. 🤟🏻

    Reply
  13. THE sovereignty THRONE permit and its commandments with new WORLD is in REV 21 and 22…
    1610-1620
    Is the healing words of nations is it CONGRESS and its courts? NO

    THE BILBLE is a throne book among many religions of the old world with kings…
    SATAN is the one that brakes the commandments to the sovereignty THRONE permit the appointed Christ before the NEW world and the OLD world of KINGS …
    THE throne permit operates off a direct democracy of nations with no GOD or temples in its LAND measured out in the THRONE permit… IS its a CHRISTION NATION.. NO… the names of 12 tribes are on the outer gates and its nations who worship its lambs are in the 12 gates and both sides can bring its honor and glory to the 12 GATES….. THE nations in 12 gates hold excusive rights over its living waters… END your occupations and go home or what do you think is coming at you?????
    THE bible covers some 3500 denominations and covers NONE god rants WHY?
    A THRONE registry BOOK is not and extermination right for conservatives throwing a PARTY
    CAN your scam constitutions violate the THRONE permit commandments . AND the this THRONE is not made by 10 commandments…. NOT hard to see who is SATAN and its whores pimping extermination rights on a throne permit… WHAT the clown fails to mention is you server under a SOVERIENTY THRONE permit awarded to you…. Judeo-Christian names are on the outer gate not in the 12 GATEs of nations with its apostle names granted to the lambs at the wedding throne permit delivered on the mayflower boat 1620… WHAT are your commandments that grants you a right to trade in its living waters and LAW TABLE of healing words of nations… ARE you granted to sell circus tickets to its extermination???

    Reply
  14. The solution to centralization is de-centralization. Instead of conservatives trying to wrestle back central power, take the power away from the center. At least at the state level, we could have some sense in at least some of the states.

    Reply

Post Comment